New cards tomorrow! Predictions are Riots, GHEIST, Sentinel, and Saks.
Gold token... lucky spin gets you a cr likely worth more that striker rb
Oh ok thanks haha
I hate surv. No prizes, waste of time.
Even ELO is better.
Alright guys it was a mistranslation. no harm done on this one
there was also a gap of 12 mins between the announcement and the actual tokenz being available with the elite packs
@man eater bug
contact support directly or an admin
the major thing to consider is that UR spotted the mistakes,q uickly took ownership of them and more importantly apologized for it. that is a major improvement from past mistakes.
yes shouldnt happen, but it does, and how UR handles this has improved in the past weeks. that in itself is a good thing
edited by wasteroftime saturday 25/04/2015, 04:21
Look at a pack pull thread. Pretty much everyone agrees the rates are equal. There are times I've opened 5 in a row with rares, and others where I've gone 5 without them. The danger in saying what you did is that your sample size is too small - only 3. Increase sample size and you'll find the rates everyone claims are there.
By my recent sample size, I bought 1 pack and got Matriochka from a 20 Cred pack. I guess she's in 100% of packs. 3 seems like it should be nice, but we've all has bad runs, and UR pack pulls are no exception.
Also, saying it doesn't count because all 4 are good makes no sense. I am using pack data from the week you are claiming it's not worth it. Not a hypothetical pack week. Regardless, even removing 2 more, do you really think it's going to cover the entire 49% difference? I'll give you maybe 5%, but that's still a hefty bit to be off.
As for LW - I still want UR to change it so I can simultaneously choose my cards at the same time, eliminating the need to switch my intended Leader halfway through and giving me a worse deck than I otherwise could've built.
Gimme my la junta card!
we need a new la junta that is not a piece of crap. and we need a new huracan card in general
Hello Urban Rivals players,
There was recently a small technical issue with messages to Support. It's possible that some of you have not received a response to your inquiries. The problem is now solved, and some of the missing answers have been sent out (with a few still remaining to be answered.) Please check your mail box, and if you have still not received an answer, please feel free to send a query via our online form available here:
or directly at this e-mail address: email@example.com
Thank you for your understanding, and good game!
@ Rift120 - Did you have any doubles of a character in play in the training room when the mission points are not recorded?
Tnx for that
Yayoi can't be compared to Jean. While Jean is a very efficient walling 2s, he still only life gaps 3 (5 with fury) and doesn't usually damage enough to provide KOs. Yayoi is a monster that opens a KO options for Charlie and at the end of the day provides a damage reduction via Clan Bonus. This gives her a variety of roles aside from SOA waller. While Jean has SOA, he still doesn't have any DR abilities. Now if Jean was a 8/1 with SOA and -2 opp damage min 1, this would be a much different story.
I usually use byron as a card to win rounds more than inflict damage. His 9 power makes him good at winning. I have managed to use in in round 4 sometimes to win when your opponents saveing pillz to try and win on round 4 aswell..
My problem is with you calling it an exploit (you said "exploiting". Exploits were Noctezuma without condition, Rbs not counting as doubles. Abusing exploits - "exploiting" - is close to cheating. Yet last LW was played exactly as it was intended by staff. As a proof look at Ghelas's words in this very thread that he considers current LW the fastest way to earn game money at the moment. So if staff member comments so it means that it was an intended effect by makers. Therefor no exploit and no exploiting.
You basically called people who won numerous Striker Rb (I'm one of them) cheaters the way I saw it, which is offensive. Poor choice of words maybe.
But leaving the word use behind - yes, it was the easiest way to earn some big worth fast that I can remember in UR. And something like that haven't happened before, unknown if will happen again and if so how often. So far I see no problem with it - ALL players had a splendid chance to earn valuable card (multiple copies in fact), some have used that chance succesfully. Ergo number of players happy. Any problem? Is Market busted now? Doesn't looks that way. Is Striker Rb "worthless because he was so easy obtainable"? No, his price is very high.
It was a rare, generous, positive occurence in my opinion. Why do you dislike it exactly? "I'd like it to be harder" - OK, but why? It's not like it happens every month, or every year - or, maybe, EVER happened in the history of UR even.
If even one person decides to buy credits for this, which is their choice, then that's extra money which can be spent on more new additions and improvements for every player. e.g New cards, a new game mode e.t.c
Every purchase of credits made by a player allows the game to run and improvements be made for every player.
edited by UM_AaaBattery monday 30/03/2015, 12:25
New leader is a mercenary it looks like
Actually the thing im looking forward to is this
"we plan to do several big things to make UR "news-worthy" again, and to engage a large volume of new players, including ones that may have tried UR in the past but failed to be engaged in a long-term way."
anything other than this is just details