Oh, I see it now... hidden.
W M Daexen That's what i mentioned before. Rules are broken and it seems i am right. It seems also i got ignored.
We take note of all the propositions that were made to do a survey and have a more large vision of what players would like to see and study how this could be done.
For now we have those ideas that meet our objectives we'll certainly include in the survey :
To forbid new cards too strong faster.
To forbid more than 1 card of 5 stars in the deck.
To forbid the X clans more played.
To reset bans to 0 each year (except Big 5, Jackie, etc.) and redo the bans through the year.
To modify the rythm of the bans from the staff to fixed dates each few months.
To modify the vote system for players, allowing perhaps more card to be banned weekly.
To create a point system for cards to allow the construction of a deck in ELO.
To find a way to make player vote more often for weekly bans.
To add a random factor to weekly bans.
I thank you for your participation here, a lot of really interestings things to think about.
I remind you that the first proposal we made about aging cards is totally discarded.
Can I just say I really hate this format? Other people say the other ones feel like lotteries, but this is the one that feels the most like a lottery, because you have to hope you guess the KO turn right, and if you don't you're screwed.
I know I'm probably in the minority on this, but I could really do without seeing the No KO, for a long LONG time.
I still can grind my mission by using android when I obtained the card,I just press fight again button until my mission done
I thought this coliseum event was excellent. I had a lot of fun trying to design a deck that would perform well within the constraints of no pillz. I settled on a Piranas/Uppers strategy with Ahkab - Goldie - Bonnie Ld - Baba (to combat opponent's Ahkab) and Zatman - Nellie - Jose Star - Lydia. It was pretty good, but by no means the only way to play. I ran into one opponent with a brutal Jungo attack manipulation deck, and the Sentinel deck was also competitive.
Don't see why they couldn't add new lds and when each clan's ld time comes, you just have to select which ld you want and receive the requisite quests...
You can get them by buying or trading with other players, getting lucky in ELO or DT, or by winning Events with Cr Prizes.
I had some big cheating suspicions about the level 33 veteran with 630 points too (the 1st place guy). Good thing if he got somehow checked by staff. And yes, I think it would've been good if we somehow got informed - disclosing that cheaters got caught and punished should discourage others from cheating. And boost the good faith of those who participate honestly.
Kalindra? But she only just arrived...ah well.
Nice............. wont have to face most of big crs now.......
I LOVE this Colloseum format.
- every card was allowed
- EVO was allowed
- doubles was allowed
Last time I play with simillar restriction was about 3 years ago ... and frm that time there was no similar tournament organized by staff.
I think kate should send a message about your winnings for this mode.
and a way to check history of previous events if possible.
it's so confusing as new event's are taking place so soon right after the previous event.
...too bad there is no history of the Coliseum formats and rankings...if you finish your combats early the chances to know your final ranking are low. Would it be possible te receive a Kate message with your ranking and prize like for the tourneys?
I'm hopin' for madelone or Malicia...
i really dislike Lady.
i think extra 5 stars are useless...
4 stars are so much more interesting.
Travel three weeks back in time and look at the Coliseum page.
Joeseph; that's not a KO. Event is called NO KO, NO VICTORY.
I have also wondered often while playing UR why doesn't Kate give us messages like eg:
Congratulations "Insert Player Name Here"
You played in the Last Coliseum: "Insert Coliseum Name Here" and ranked Xth out of XXXX players.
You have won XXXX Clintz to be spent on the players market etc. etc.