header image

thursday 19/08/2010

Lamar Cr is wayyy too expensive, guys.
I would recommend with El Gringo or Oyoh. Oyoh is very solid against SoA, but El Gringo has amazing reduction.

wednesday 18/08/2010

The easiest way to win a dt is to use uppers+hugo or ambre, and montana+hugo. But if you want to continue using piranas I recommend adding hugo. His +6 attack will give your cards an advantage over your opponent by stopping their bonus and giving your an attack edge. Good luck smiley

Hmm your play style seems more suited to attack manipulation clans or clans with high damage. Uppers and Montana are great options and la junta will keep your opponent guessing who you will finish him off with after you get the first hit. Good luck choosing your clan smiley

monday 16/08/2010

I'm still very much a beginner and I've been working with different clan combos, started with GHEIST and Montana, did okay. But recently made a switch to Pirana and Uppers and I gotta say when I draw Sting and Jeeves, it's a 2-turn KO every time.

friday 13/08/2010

Pussycats are a difficult clan to play with in DT they rely on taking your time to win fights IMO

That is T1 and T2 you are looking for. (Just under normal)

But yes I agree it should be a new tag.

thursday 12/08/2010

Knowing the rules helps: http://www.urban-rivals.com/game/rules.php?show=table

So long as they can win outright and/or get favorable round matchups, smaller hands and lower star cards get more points than high point hands and cards. People can and do play larger decks successfully, but anything over 28* is usually 1) very fast or 2) more than 8 cards, so the stars in an average hand end up being similar to what you'd get in "smaller" decks, but with some heavier hands and some lighter hands than an 8 card setup would offer.

It's either Spiaghi or Lehane. Both can be used on any deck as a splash card, and tells you a lot.

wednesday 11/08/2010

Jumped into another T1 room with 38 mins left to go.. scored in the 290's.. check the battle report.

1st game was a 1hko. all other crushes were 2hko's

21:01 ..you drew with Monsieur Lee, La Congrégation de l'Ombre (5-5) – your wins: 12 points and 3 Clintz
20:57 ..you lost against flpjun2 (0-smiley – your wins: 5 points and 2 Clintz
20:52 ..you narrowly escaped from gileloup, _- last night-_ (5-4) – your wins: 20 points and 5 Clintz
20:48 ..you crushed Xizen, KNIGHTS OF VALHALA (12-0) – your wins: 17 points and 9 Clintz
20:46 ..you were annihilated by Taso Inoki, E X C A L I B U R (0-12) – your wins: 3 points and 4 Clintz
20:43 ..you crushed qqpp (12-0) – your wins: 16 points and 9 Clintz
20:41 ..you crushed Xizen, KNIGHTS OF VALHALA (12-0) – your wins: 16 points and 9 Clintz
20:38 ..you crushed PsychBR, Dragões Brasileiros (12-0) – your wins: 15 points and 9 Clintz
20:36 ..you crushed tappi, novice (12-0) – your wins: 18 points and 9 Clintz
20:34 ..you beat bownez (5-1) – your wins: 19 points and 5 Clintz
20:29 ..you crushed Nuk3man (12-0) – your wins: 15 points and 9 Clintz

tuesday 10/08/2010

Thanks for the advice guys. I"ll try Rubie for Zatman and if I don't like that possibly Nellie.

monday 09/08/2010

So much wrongness i nthe second post in this thread. During a DT bonus points are limited to a maximum of 2 per fight.

You gain bonus points for winning with over 12 life points, winning by KO & 2 for every pill you have left.

In a DT you could win 14-0 & have 14 pills but you would still only get 2 bonus points.

In short, read the rules about daily tournaments.

sunday 08/08/2010

Close please Mods.

Thanks for this.
Although game is still stupid.
I play on elo room which defines.

Room option(s):
No random, the highest attack always wins.
You can participate in the daily tournaments.

And seriously new players dont bother looking the settings.
I got lvl 30 to rage on forums and learn about it.
At least they should change the default setting to no random.

saturday 07/08/2010

If you don't have 15k and need something even cheaper, but also more effective you can also try any of my budget decks.

Hugo/Uppers. is only around 6.5k total. I've also won DTs' wit this deck as well.
Ballroom Blitz! is also around 6.5k. I've won multiple DTs' with this deck as well. Only a 1 card change. If you prefer power=opp power then this would be better suited to you. Otherwise use the first deck with Frankie.

Again, these are budget decks and the best Uppers decks will usually use Jackie in place of Jody, but again... these are budget decks.

friday 06/08/2010

Time in tourny should def be reduced, I am not the best or even good, but i don't waste time during tournys! it drives me crazy when someone idles until they are dropped.. i have 100% rate! I don't leave the game so i gotta sit there and sit there! AHHHHHHHHH lol it does suck though.

I will play with some very very low star decks later and see how well i do. I usually just play with my normal deck but just in hopes of getting those extra credits for being in the top 1/3rd, but i'll try harder and maybe have some feedback!

Rage is right you need to play more offence cards.
a good way to win daily tourments is get a 1hko and use it or bluff its good for a bluff cause the other player might waste all their pills

thursday 05/08/2010


this deck is a beast but im looking for suggestions that will make it a little better

rate up while you are it plz......also thanks

Your deck has to many stars to get you a top place in a daily turnament, also it has a focus on abilities that drag out the game (+life and even DR).

It might work for type 2 survivor though, even if it will not give you 10 wins in a row, a couple of 5 wins can really pay some bills.

Good luck.

In that case it's pretty solid for General Use, but for DM there are other cards that may be better depending on your playing style. However the one solid thing that you've setup for yourself is that your using fairly high powered cards.

Rated Green.

To "make the podium" you have to get first place/Win in the DT. Even after you win your first DT, it only unlocks another Mission, which is to win 5 DTs.

Hope this helps out.

Create a subject