I agree with KON... Some of the highest ranked players are using either full or half deck Montanas. (I told you the word Noob would surface too). Normally the word Noob is used by someone that cannot write a skillful post explaining their interpretation.
Mona with very few pills dominates a lot of cards. As long as she gets her clan bonus, a 6/4 with -2 pow and -12 atk isn't something to overlook. There are plenty of wonderful cards in the Montana clan so, It is far from a beginner's only clan. It's great that there are some inexpensive cards so lower level players can play with them also!
@Pimplicious I have sent you a summons in the mail.
Obviously u guys use Montana with a passion because honestly Montana is not hard to use
I have beaten guys with hands of Vickie Cr Jackie Zatman and Dorian with my T1 deck that I love
Honestly the clan is pretty if you have a hard time with Montana then u just need help
Also I dont get bashed by Montana since I am not a "noob" anyway why you guys think that Ulu Watu, Freaks, are barely used
because of the attack manipulation
@skrillamatik I would definitely beat you if u use a Montana deck
in high Elo MOntana are rarely used
in low 1000s they are everywhere
Hate Me but Montana sucks
NO hate mail PLZ
Montana are relatively easy to use, but calling them a noob clan is incorrect. They are actually less of a noob clan than many others such as rescue, sentinel or junkz. Mainly due to the fact that many of their cards are much higher priced. Also if you compare them to rescue, they are at a disadvantage. rescue has cheap but relatively good 2* sob, 3* soa, 3 stop ability cards and 5* with protection bonus. Not to mention if the player puts a lil money in to get kerry, she is better than edd in some ways. I mean edd has 1 power extra but kerry has the extra dmg giving her way more K.O options and with her bonus being +12 atk gives her a better advantage in bluffing.
As for them being a clan with "no skill required", there is always some skill required if they are good players. Sure some bad players might use them but many good players use them too so generalising a clan isn't going to strengthen your case. As for talking about ELO, this player was asking for advice on a T1 deck, but obviously you didnt read that as you only came in here to bash the clan. When it comes to them being rarely used in high ELO, where are you getting your statistics from? I've seen them used in high ELO and ppl get over 1400 with them.
Pimplicious: I know a person who gets 1300+ every week with mono montane -_- i also can easily get 1200 with them (dont bother for 1300) they can be really good in elo because thats were all the "stratergy" is so less attack clans, they can shine against non attack bonuses, i will give u that but everyclan does, saying montana sucks? hmm i think someones having trouble beating them , oh and it is actually easy to beat montana with ulu, nanook = 10 power with bonus vs montana, 6 and 7 powers, lulabee gets the dreaded bonus away adn destroys them with power, taigo and gaia beat them in unless opponent uses 1-2 pills "I have beaten guys with hands of Vickie Cr (Cr) Jackie (R) Zatman (U) and Dorian (U) with my T1 deck" want a medal? i have beaten harder decks in type one and if u actually think for a second, u just said 3 uppers and 1 montana, the montana didn't even have its bonus and ur dissing them? vs mono before u want to talk about usefulness