I think it's been said before, but it makes no sense to ban cards like sylth or blaaster on any other level but the level that they get their ability. But I doubt anybody would use those characters on any other level but full so that doesn't make my case. So a better example would be cards like copper should be unbanned at level 4, but banned at level 5. I know that it might require more votes to ban only a certain level, but I still would love to hear opinions on this.
Broccoliman51: I am awear of that but wanda is the best 1 star in the game and can beat most 2 stars, + she can - damage, she is the most defensive 1 star there is, charlie is like copper but she is much much more solid, if she vses sob she still can reduce and attack them, while copper can just attack, and against soa.....well charlie is way better in that sence, as for yayoi, well she probably wont get banned but she is very similar to jackie in a way, both get ability at lvl 3, both have same damage in 3 and 4 and just 1 power less, I dont believe people will ban them alot but if your smart you will get rid of wanda, and why would you ban her in general at 2 star she is just average card
Well Yookie is only 600 clintz, 3* Yayoi is 8000.
Yookie would never get banned because basically everyone can afford him, and Noodile and Rico are preferable options (people would ban them instead).
Whereas Yayoi - she's flexible, stops those Sylth, Murray etc. and costs a ton every time she levels.