: ). I know. not very insightful, but in my opinion, he throws off the competitve balance of ELO. if tanaraeva is banned, and Wee lee, how is Lamar still playable? So create some new comptetitive card for All Star which they have and take him off the table. I mean if Baby Q can be a banned card. Explain to me how Lamar cannot. I have played against the card plenty of times and come out on top, but I am beginning to see the rift.
This is not a complaint, just a concise opinion about a card that should not be playable in ELO. No flames please, just looking for other peoples opinions. Thank you.
In fact banning unevolved cards from ELO and unban some cards that was strong due to this will be a nice thing. But the fact is that will make the game with a lot of same decks. Using unevolved cards ensure different decks and bases at the same time that moves (in part) the market.
Talking about Vickie, she is very strong, but look at the rest of Montana, they're nothing special with some nice cards (except Lyse Teria Cr which is strong, but it's a collector). And she is a 5 star, which makes the other clan that you choose to be not so strong. So you have only one very strong card and the rest not so good. It's different from Uppers (for example) that have Dorian and Zatman, or All Stars that have Lamar and Striker or even Pussycats that have Charlie and Yayoi. The unban of Vickie will be a great addition to Montana, as it would not unbalace the clan (that is weak in comparsion with others).
Lamar should not be banned, as he is strong, but not unbeatable. Remember that the strongest cards from All Stars have 4 and 5 stars (with Flo and even Ashley is good).
Just to end, i really would like to see all the cards (except for the Old Cr) to be unbanned, and the clans that not have any to get cards from the same level. This would make the decks to have more options and would not unbalance the game.