There had been a lot of rumors as to why there were no staff banned cards in the last elo tournament and the most intriguing rumor is that the staff will change the perma ban list. i was thrilled by this but seeing the current format, there hadn't been any change. this made me quite pissed since a change in the perma ban list would help reduce the number of cards that i consider perma ban material that are wasting player votes and it will also give the clans that are, nowadays rarely used in elo, a chance to be better.
here are my proposed cards that should move on the perma ban list: rowdy, wee lee removed, toro and spyke add, ghumbo and lou could move or stay (not quite sure of these two). i'm looking to argue and not to have a pointless bashing with someone.
"People have opinions..."
One of the most overused fallacious/erroneous/ineffective reasoning of average to novice people that has been used in time.
You'll barely get anywhere with that opinion. I think I'll just agree that you do not play ELO then.
Seems like people don't get the main point of banning.
The first point of banning is to remove unbalanced cards like Caelus Cr from the game, so that it doesn't turn the whole game into a "If you don't use it, counter it". That makes the game boring because it would be based around a few OP cards.
The second point of banning is to ensure variety. This is why there are weekly ELO bans, and this is also why there are perma ELO bans. Simply because without perma ELO bans, some clans would go completely out of line. This is also the more important reason for banning.
This is also the reason why UR hasn't perma banned Olga and Bogdan (something I kept seeing on the 1st - 2nd page...) because even though they are stronger on average, without them, Freaks are doomed.
The point of banning is not to "screw XXX clan over into unplayability", but to let other clans have a chance.
I don't really agree on your reason on closing this thread. You should learn how to back read post before you comment, that's one thing that I learned in many forums that I've been (not just UR). The tone of some of our post here maybe in an aggressive mode but we are just sharing our opinions towards the topic. (That’s what the thread starter is asking.) We are not flamebaiting or bashing one another. In fact, you’re the one who started to make this thread wayoff the hook. *peace
OT: Though Toro and Ghumbo had been consistently being banned either by votes or by staff. UR should reconsider him joining the list of permabanned. What do you think about Zatman and Uranus being unbanned, how about some of the Leaders like Bridget?
Zatman and Uranus shoudn't be unbanned.
Uppers got no problem in their ranks. And Zatman is still hands down strong, near the word OP.
While for Uranus. Hmmm... so hard. It's either yep. release her. but most likely UR will just release a sakrohm replacement for her.. until then, sakrohm would be a little handicapped in ELO.