GGork & Sir Murde have thought some changes to make an ELO mode more fair (regarding to prizes and votations in this mode), this is just an idea, you can leave your opinion or ideas to change this .
Now 0 Cover & xGer will post the changes here.
Well, this idea was in the game, that we used only "newer"cards and it's dead now. Let it rest in peace and do not try to ressurect.
Anyway - hi, i'm awful player - i was never focused on scores, this game is collecting for me, soi will never win any crs anyway if it wont change, BUT
I think top 50 proposed by staff is nice move - i can imagine if someone is ambitious, it is better to reward them more. Ideas from here could be interesting too, but i'm quite worried if we go too far, then few players in this game will have monopoly on cr cards - one of reasons why ELO results are so low nowadays is because there is LESS players and making rules, which will totally favour old, great players won't be a perfect idea, as it will propably discourage some players to even try to compete with all "players-legends".
+ according to post above - making strong cards, even those like last Quetzal is not bad, as ELO is only one way to play (T2? remember?) Unplayable Cards? - maybe i'm ignorant, but for me unplayable is card like 2/7 (All Mohrla / Sunnygoat etc. stuff) and there are no released cards like his anymore.
I think an improvement to the prizes is a good idea, but not as pricey.
Like I think 1-5th should get amazing prizes, worth more than they are now instead of 1st just getting big 5, would be better.
So 1st Big 5, 2nd a lesser card worth around 2million such as Lamar Cr, then 3rd to 5th with a 1 million CR,
6th to 10th with the 300-400k Cr's they've got then 10th onwards to distribute the rest of the "Normal prizes" which I believe should be raised to have like the minimum prize for a top 100 being around 20k.
It's difficult to balance the new clans and new cards and ELO as a whole. You change something. Another card looks OP and become overused and all players scream that it is a 50/50 card and wants it banned. That's the irony of it.
I had interviewed many established players in the past - those who participated in events, elo, daily tournament and all of them said it isn't easy to balance all 3 and players will always find the "next best" card to "abuse".
It's a lot about understanding the meta and counter it with individual skills.
My suggestion would be to release some powerful cards to make things coherent..
Rex balthazar graven kero xu52 are unban.
In other hand ongh lou fuzz are ban..
Every clan should have equal chances of getting played for me. On other hand im against this defeat meta with cards like ginnifer , vixen , xantiax robb, dudley ld dj korps etc... Which has a bad impact on meta clearly.
Problem release stronger cards mean other's get pushed out cause of a price gap. for newer players. cant afford it.
an older cards get pushed farther way.
what we really need to do is go through all the cards 1 by one an see witch ones are to powerful compared to there counter parts an witch ones were banned to see if they don't need to be banned. an re-balance elo it self.
i personally don't see the problem with 50/50 cards they all ways been the turn around cards to me that can win a game for you. an all cards have these 50/50 cards so no clan was every left out in that area. but as soon a soon 50/50 card came out all hell broke loose. witch never made sense to me.
I thought 50/50 cards gave the game a mechanic alone its own that said you winning now but i can turn it around if i play this card right. witch all other card games have millions of those 50/50 cards in them. an they do really well.
prizes should be slightly high in elo yes make's player work for it but not to high or people with money over free players will be unfair an drive new players an free players away from elo then you have only 100 playing a week an that's not good.