Check out the exact winnings table: http://www.urban-rivals.com/game/rules.php?show=table
The most points your deck could possibly get in a game is
25 - 16 = 9 points for the win (assuming you don't draw ANY 4 star cards)
4 * 3 = 12 points for round victories (you can't win 4 rounds; you'll KO in 3)
+ 1-2 points if you KO with any leftover pillz
Your opponents aren't going to be using stacked decks, and you're going to draw 5 stars since you have so many in the deck. In the end, you're probably going to average 15 - 18 points for a win, which is really poor. You'd need 22 - 25 wins, without ANY losses, to finish in the top 10 at that rate. YOu won't win every game, because you'll invariably run into a few beastly decks with killer cards like Lyse Teria, folks who get dealt both Uranus and Graksmxxt, and so on. You might be able to finish in the top 50 of a busy tournament if you're very lucky, but that's about it.
The best Type II decks are built around powerhouse cards like Zatman that can take down larger opponents, netting big points. They're also built so that you can draw the game out vs. fast opponents, getting extra points from winning extra rounds with weaker cards (Flo, Mickey T), or go for a quick 2-hit KO using a huge damage card like Vickie, Lamar Cr, etc. if someone is playing too slowly.
Actualy in the pournaments with this deck many times i don't care if i lose.when all my cards lose i get 5 points(usually)when one of my cards win and i lose i get about 7 or 8 points.when i win i get 13 to 16-17 points. there isn't so much difference.i don't have to think a lot and thus i make quick battles.if the other has weak cards i try to win with 3 cards.if i can't i win with 2 cards.and i always keep one pill in the end(if there is a possibility)when i see that the other has good cards the first round desides how i will play(fast,carefully,win with three cards,etc)with this tactic(and if the opponents play fast)i play almost 30 games a tournament!!!!!even if i lose all my matches i'll get 150 points.you understand why i like it?????
Well, you WERE asking for some tips on how to improve this deck. Take it from RG365, Akuaku, invoker, JP and... even me.
we've had quite our experiences in winning TQs and do trust us when we say that this deck has too many stars. Sure, losing with this deck will net you 5-7 points (as you said).... but also think about how much points YOU'RE GIVING to your opponent.
Low-powered cards aren't necessarily weak. i agree with JP that this deck wont win tournaments. if you dont believe me, why dont you look at the presets of the winners of TQs (if ever they do have one posted). You'll see that they balance strong and efficient cards will a good star count. Sure, an uppers/montana deck with Jackie Zatman Beetenka Dorian Vickie Don Edd Enzo will be really overpowering, but compared to a toned-down deck of Jackie Rubie Zatman Samantha Vickie Mona Prince Jr Ottavia, the 2nd deck will actually have a higher chance of winning you the tournament, or even ranking high!
Points in TQs are strongly dependent on your battle points WHEN YOU WIN, rather then when you lose.
you can read my posts regarding this, if you want, by clicking this link: http://www.urban-rivals.com/community/forum/?mode=viewsubject&forum_page=0&id_subject=389983&subject_page=1
hope that helps