ELO: Votes and restrictions

141/307

Euzebe Imperator The Saiyans Tuesday 08/09/2009, 10:14

We've already told you that we were going to see how things would be going with the secret voting system about possible changes in ELO mode. And that's exactly what we’ve done.

Firstly, we’ve decided to leave the voting system as it is. It works well and should work even better in the future with characters banned thanks to votes.

We've checked voting results and the most frequently played characters in ELO stats.
We've decided to permanently ban 5 characters: Kolos, Marco, Zatman, Hawk and Ratanah.

Kolos is permanently banned because it was obvious that you did not want him in ELO any more. He’s been banned nearly every weeks since the voting system release and we thought it was pointless to keep on using your votes against him.

Marco, Zatman, Hawk and Ratanah have also been frequently banned by your votes so we thought that these permanent bans would offer a fairer game.
Admittedly Ratanah was banned less often than Shakra but we calculated that her ban would greatly help in reducing the Roots' dominance while still making them playable. Whereas Shakra’s ban would have left the Roots with very strong chances of building powerful half-decks for a reasonable amount of stars.

We didn’t want to ban any All Stars or Piranas (Smokey or Striker, for example) even if they were concentrating a large part of votes. We figured out you would be more free to vote and decide by yourselves which characters need to be remove from ELO.

Have fun !

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

142/307

Zeth4 Master Soul City Tuesday 01/12/2009, 23:13

Smokey is't cheap
143/307

Vinyl-Scratch Titan D-Versified Tuesday 01/12/2009, 23:30

Lol leaders are on. I think this is good. Not that leaders are overpowered but they'll get most of the votes and so the other cards will have less chance of being banned by card haters just cas they lose to them.
144/307

Kate Urban Rivals Staff Monday 26/04/2010, 22:48

When is caelus going to fit this scenario? (Replace kolos with caelus)

"Kolos is permanently banned because it was obvious that you did not want him in ELO any more. He’s been banned nearly every weeks since the voting system release and we thought it was pointless to keep on using your votes against him."
145/307

AllKnowingGod Senior Vicious Salvo Monday 26/04/2010, 23:14

Speaking of votes.....many american members are getting their presets bombarded with red faces and then our presets are deleted....to make people rate fairly(or prevent the hater parade) as just a suggestion...they should maybe have to leave a comment before they rate..or presets just arnt deleted for being in the negatives or a low number..because im sick of my amazing presets getting delete then stolen by foreign players...
146/307

crazypants Senior Tuesday 27/04/2010, 00:23

I know AllKnowingGod that has happen to me so many times that i can't count it any more
147/307

TnT_Mathwiz Imperator Tuesday 27/04/2010, 00:30

@AKG
I completely agree! I have found many of my recent presets diminish from the 900's down to the low negatives overnight. Although it seems like that recurrent problem was a glitch (and it appears to have ended), I think it would still be great if players were required to post a comment if they wished to rate red. It would decrease the amount of "hate sprees" and encourage salient comments and constructive criticism. Good idea, AKG.
148/307

-Grave Lie- Titan URBAN MADNESS Tuesday 27/04/2010, 01:14

@AKG and Math: I'm sure if that was implemented, the haters would just post " ". Lol... Or worse, a " ".
149/307

Kate Urban Rivals Staff Tuesday 27/04/2010, 01:59

Or they could just lie N say good deck but still rate red
Maybe limit it to friends although the highest you'll get in rating would be 7,500 N that's if all 250 friends of yours rate green within 48 hours
150/307

-Wicer- Titan Harbingers of Ares Tuesday 27/04/2010, 02:19

Wait so there are people rating down american presets?
That's low, but I've never heard of it happening. I like AKG's idea, because I had a 9 card DT deck that got deleted because it was red faced too much but I got no comments on it. It was similar to FIF's deck too.
151/307

TnT_Wazzupz Master TRiNiTY Tuesday 27/04/2010, 03:53

I agree wit ch'yall at least a comment or something before a red face

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

ELO: Votes and restrictions

ELO: Votes and restrictions

Answer to this subject