who do you think is better?
-3 DRs(jeena arno and yookie)
-one awsome CR
-good semi evos(jeena and noodile)
-1 amazing blocker(shakra)
-1 solid 4*(ratanha)
-only problem is that there two strongest ELO cards are often banned (shakra and ratanha)
-great 3* blocker(leviatonn)
-2 powerhouses(rolph and toro)
- 2HKO combos(methane XU52 and (rolph in half decks))
-only 1 DR
-3 very usable 2*(z3r0 d34d arkn and somtimes platinum)
-platinum is amazing against copper and louise(he takes down +Power ability cards)
Which do you think is better?
(personally i think that they are equally good but i prefer roots because of there staple DRs and solid cards)
tell who you think is better and why.
I haven't really seen what Roots can do but they have a more gradual increase in market prices, meaning for more good cards all around while Gheist has and entire 1000 clintz gap between Dr. Saw (mediocre in my opinion) and Methane/Rolph ; Gheist only have 2 damage reducers, one being cr; the early Gheist are vunerable to their abilities and very few have good power: 6 on average and the few early ones that have 7 power are instantaneosly defenders while Roots does have enough power to kill and quite a lot more attack manipulation. Gheist on the other hand has some cheap cards that rely on abilities like: poison and power reducers while some hardly have any abilities at all, actually Brutox and Lilith are duplicates, pointless. Gheist is only good for the rich/experienced players mainly for elo while Roots is rather over powering and if you can find a way around the elo ban: using more thought to replace the ultra uber cards with cards to make your attacks less predictable, than it is better. I've mainly played a rather mediocre Gheist deck and I've lost quite a lot. In order for Gheist to properly work, you need to predict your opponent well, and use such to your advantage. Platinum and arkn are only useful if you can work them in to proper use, the few good abilites that manipulate attack at a cheap price and low level. Ending Review.