who do you think is better?
-3 DRs(jeena arno and yookie)
-one awsome CR
-good semi evos(jeena and noodile)
-1 amazing blocker(shakra)
-1 solid 4*(ratanha)
-only problem is that there two strongest ELO cards are often banned (shakra and ratanha)
-great 3* blocker(leviatonn)
-2 powerhouses(rolph and toro)
- 2HKO combos(methane XU52 and (rolph in half decks))
-only 1 DR
-3 very usable 2*(z3r0 d34d arkn and somtimes platinum)
-platinum is amazing against copper and louise(he takes down +Power ability cards)
Which do you think is better?
(personally i think that they are equally good but i prefer roots because of there staple DRs and solid cards)
tell who you think is better and why.
If ratanah gets back roots will be easily surprime but for now gheist is better in elo.
in t1 I like both, but i think i'd give roots is just a bit better. but it really all depends on the other half.
roots are far better in making low star halfs. remember the yookie, noodile cr, rico, arno half ? you got a strong half with 14*'s left for the other half, wich is a lot!
gheist can make very scary high star half decks.
mathene, rolph, wardom and toro are all devistading cards and the have leviation, wich is in my eyes the best full stop in the game.
I personally use GHEIST , but I do think the Roots are the more solid clan
because of their DRs for defense and High base power for offense.
In a straight up real battle, GHEIST will be at the disadvantage by the lack of their offensive abilities.
If you compare the 2 clans with all the power(I mean how strong) Roots wins(Kiki cr all the way!)
I hate to admit this but gheist is now much compatible in elo.. but when playing the 2 clans, most of my highest scores came from roots paired with uppers.. I don't know why... I love roots as much as I hate facing them in elo xD