I'm sure nearly everyone who plays elo regularly noticed this, but Hawk is up for voting as well remaining on the permaban list. Is this intentional? I mean it does have some clear benefit for being available for voting because it allows all of the other cards to go down in percentage and it gives the players a sort of "pass" vote in order to tilt the scale just enough to let their favorite card go free without worrying about pushing it over the 5% mark by voting "keep", but I still want to confirm if the UR devs did this intentionally.
@ wise - He only appeared on the voting list because every card that gets removed from the temp banned list goes there first. If you go on with banning him, he'll stay there forever. Or at least, as long as the staff doesn't remove him like they did with Morphun and Caelus.