Personnaly i dont have alot of Clintz. This means that i genrally have to play Elo to survive, because i cant win against High-powered elo banned cards, and cant afford them to use for myself.
My main problem now though is piranas. I personnaly liked playing attack manipulating decks such as Uppers and All Stars because i could get a strong deck for only 8000 clints or less. But now it seems like half of the people i play have pirana decks! Their ability is devastating! Imo it destroys Montana, Uppers most All Star, Sakrohm, Bangers and Ulu-Watu and Rescue. Junks and Sentinel are hindered drastically too! No healing for Jungo, no poisen for Freaks! Fang Pi Clang and La Junta can say goodbye to their damage bonus. Roots and GHIEST loose there stop ability and Vortex and Pussy Cats have no bonus to fall back on when they die.
THATS ALL THE CLANS?!?!
This would be understandable if Piranas characters wernt so powerful themselves, and sure they have very few 8 power BUT!!! They have pill manipulation!! Pill manipulation is a super-strong but risky form of attack manipulation. Hawkins Noel (2 star) 7 power with +2 pillz, provided you win is like +14 attack?!! And Scrubb in a mono deck is like +24 attack?!?!?!??!?!?!?
DOES THIS CLAN HAVE ANY WEAKNESS? If they do please let me know, if someone can suggest a deck to counter them for under 10k clintz I would be very gratefull. Thanks for reading
Beating Piranas on a budget ? Hmm let´s see...
Liam Redra Danae Greem
That´s 11 stars and roughly 3500 Clintz, we need some more "punch" though. How about
Mindy Pegh Askai Nahema
For the remaining 14 stars ?
With roughly 6000 Clintz for the second half this approaches your 10k limit quite closely, but it will get the job done. Note that mono-skeelz might be even cheaper and equally effective against Piranas, but mono-skeelz has serious problems in the 50% of matches where you do not play against piranas.
@Kitsune: Hearing the comment "Ulrich is irreplaceable" from a self-proclaimed "expert Piranas player" in itself already makes your whole post void, to be honest.
And you do either have a problem with post interpretation and reading comprehension or you simply love to twist the words of others. Either way, let me help you out here:
I never said "Ulrich = Tyd = Taljion = Ector". For once I have to agree with you, that is a dumb statement. I said that each of these 3* is a very viable card and has its own uses. I also said that it comes down to personal preference which one to use. Ulirch can be great and win matches, but he is also often worse than any of the other 3* ever could be. There are so many good SoA and life gaining cards out there, that Ulrich becomes an autoloss because of his low power. Especially if you play a deck with Scubb and Tyd which is simply incapable of draining pillz since there is no attack manipulation involved whatsoever.
I also didn't "rate Scubb lower than [...] Sting". Again, reading comprehension ftw. I said that "Sting has her uses over Scubb depending on play style and deck." This statement means nothing else than, considering the rest of the deck and play style of the person, Sting may fit better than Scubb.
Raeth is so great because of his 7 base power and his attack manipulation. No point in having an ability that gives 4 pillz when you can't trigger it. Also, for the record, Petra is a staple when Sakrohm has a strong week.