I am absolutely sick of losing DTs becuase of running into drs. Surely no one posesses a reason to use Uranus, Na Boh, Trinmkkt and Graksmxxt. Dt is a fast format made for quick wins and damaging, DRs are just stallers mabey banning every DR would be a bit over the top but they are extreamly annoying and most DRs can't win a match and if they can they only do like 1 or 2 damage. 99 percent of people who use DRs in their decks like Deebler and Jeena are just out to stall and it's becoming beyond a joke I think 1 dr should be allowed in every deck and no more as for Pussy Cats well their not even meant for dt. Cherry and Muze are in most decks and they require lots of rounds to win which adds to stalling. What do you think?
Waster dont bother, this is starting to remind me about a thread made by Warlock LoA a few days ago, he proposed an idea and then refused to listen to any arguments proving his idea had no merit. We can keep saying people playing DR's have just as much right to play according their own playstyle, he'll never accept it. He cant see anybody doing well in a DT if they dont play like he expects them too. (eg: shaunt could never get into top 3rd of a dt using jungo, while most likely he can) UR sure has changed in the last 2 years, community has grown but also grew apart
"Any deck with any combination of decent cards/clans will finish in the top 3rd of almost every DT"
"top 1/3 is about 100 points. 100 points can be gained in as little as 4 games. some crazy decks can do it in 3 games. "
Yeah that was my bad I meant top 3 not top third.
"Hows this for a deck that would have frustrated you to no end
Tiny Cuts Run Deep"
No I actually really like that deck and have tried it at one point or another, I think people have the wrong impression I am not against 4 round decks I am against people that use cards that they know they will very rarely win with to make the opponent play 4 rounds there is a big difference. You can 2hko these sort of decks and if you do then quick points and if you don't then they don't have staller cards and would play fast and you lose relativly quick. People who have 4 round decks to win does not bother me, good for them but people who have cards that make the OPPONENTS deck be a 4 round deck are what annoy me greatly.
Wasteroftime you live up to your name why do you just make decks to try and get to people what does that achieve? You know damn well that you would hate it if you were winning a DT and you versed that deck but I guess you have never been in that predicament to be disagreeing with the OP so much.
the reality is i understand how DT plays out very well. I have missed out on 1st, top 3, top 5, top 10 many times because i lost the last game, or failed to get that one extra game in because of a slow player, or got annihilated by a 40 star deck, or lost to one of the other top players, etc. Oh believe me i understand it.
However, just like most things in life, we as people tend to have some sort of self serving bias. So when we are doing well in the DT we attribute it to how good we are and awesome at pilling properly with our pseudo psychic powers letting us win lots of games. And when we are not as successful, we then attribute this failure to some staller deck, a DR deck, a bad draw, etc.
In reality our success is probably based on a combination of skills and pure luck in facing off against newbie decks that give us 25+ point wins quickly. And our lack of success is probably a result of players outplaying us and getting the match up here and there (bad draw, stallers, DRs)
so let me repeat the message ive tried to communicate, for the final time. I fail to see the merit of complaining about decks that are slower (harder to 2HKO, or they play slow) when we are happy to embrace the exact opposite, easy 2HKO, fast players, quitters.
bottom line, successful DT players understand how it goes and they will still consistently place high in the vast majority of DTs.