There are only 2 Rescues banned by players this week, not 4. There are 4 Rescues in the election (Campbell, Kerry, Dr Norton, Sue) but that's usual because:
- The characters are selected from the top characters from the previous week’s top clans, plus the ones banned after the last vote.
For example Junkz also has 4 characters (Qubik, Romana, Tremorh and Flanagan)
Rescue are getting killed by staff? The 2 Rescue bans this week were player bans, not staff bans
Someone is salty from investing in rescue. Well the deck will always have cambell banned 3 out of 5 weeks and kerry 1-2 out of 5 weeks. However like mentioned those are player bans.
I actually think the UR staff is doing an excellent job in their choices in the staff bans
Your elo record is 1119 and you're acting like you have some right to complain about elo bans?
You've given no good counter point on why these cards should be unbanned,you havent at least acknowledged their strengths,and any player that plays a lot with one or two clans should know the clans they use inside out.
Marco cr/Alec cr are both part of a mono exclusive clan and are ALWAYS good draws because they'll always making the maximum of their ability.
Sledg and cliff have both given numerous opportunities to be re-integrated into elo and be played as normal cards,but consistent vote bans have shown this not to be the case.
And of course lea and elvira were trade-offs to bring back sledg,which clearly failed. They may be back someday,just now now.
Campbell gets banned because like lear barduh,they're both part of clans that utilizes life cards to their advantage and are both pretty similar in style play.
And then there's kerry,who doesnt really get banned all that often,but like lea can be a gap if needed,but is generally well liked in elo.
So there's a rundown of why cards are banned.And next time,would it kill you to write a few paragraphs about WHY you think they're getting screwed instead of just ignorantly spamming?
Because you might actually make a point if you do,you know.