The list of ELO banned and penalty bearing characters will be updated on Monday 08/24/2015
This list may be subject to amendment until Friday 21h.
Click here to view the provisional list of characters banned in ELO mode. Summary of the changes below.
The following cards will be permanently added to the list of ELO banned characters:
All Stars: Robb Cr (definitive)
Frozn: Ruru (definitive)
La Junta: Pilzken
Leader: Ashigaru (definitive)
Roots: Arno (definitive)
Sentinel: Lehane (definitive)
Skeelz: Xingshu (definitive)
Ulu Watu: Wooly (definitive)
The following cards will be permanently removed from the list of characters banned in ELO:
Roots: Gertjan (definitive)
Skeelz: Plunk (definitive)
Here is a provisional list of characters who will be penalized in the DTs:
Junkz: DJ Korr Cr
La Junta: General Cr
La Junta: Raven
La Junta: Emeth Cr
Montana: Lyse Teria Cr
Montana: Vickie Cr
Rescue: Marco Cr
Roots: Kiki Cr
Sakrohm: Guru Cr
Sentinel: Copper Cr
Uppers: Jackie Cr
All Stars: Lamar Cr (from -2 to -5)
All Stars: Saki (from -2 to -5)
La Junta: Isatis NEW
La Junta: Pilzken (from -2 to -5)
Rescue: Dr Norton
Sentinel: Hawk (from -10 to -5)
All Stars: Striker and Striker Rb NEW
Bangers: Tasty Tast
La Junta: Milena
La Junta: Sabia NEW
Rescue: Phoebe NEW
Skeelz: Caleus Cr NEW
Uppers: Nellie (from -5 to -2)
edited by J amox monday 24/08/2015, 12:53
And THAT'S A MORE REASON TO BAN RAVEN FOR GOD'S AND SATANS'S SAKE.
A good support card creates a good deck. And a good support deck provides 80-100% win. La Junta has all of that.
They have a very good round-ups and very very useful (even if they are alone) 2* cards. They have a pretty solid 3* cards, which are good at maintaining a close fight in just one round. The 4* cards can make a very good half-deck, have a very decent damage and very good ability. The 5* creates the gaps and are basically the splash cards of the decks, which is pretty annoying, considering that they have a very high POWER, A VERY DECENT DAMAGE AND BASICALLY GREAT ABILITY.
La Junta has all the powerful support cards, then at least remove big nukes ESPECIALLY Raven, so that it can REDUCE 50-50.
IF THE ADMINS CAN'T BAN RAVEN AT LEAST BAN THORMUND, MILENA AND SCOOTY. They create a path for opening a 0HKO for Raven. One more thing, 50-50 and Mono-decks has been the previous subject in the Elo Ban system.
Using all caps will make the staff ignore messages because they will think it's just an user who lost its mind to a not so relevant mode.
Plus, for those who want to ban cards the staff didn't ban or unbanned: You all can't make a strategy to counterattack them? Use your damn heads and find a way to dodge the card.
@445 Lol what an ignorant comment. Teach me how to ELO, oh almighty 1207 player. There are strategies to counter Raven, but the point is that if you build your deck to counter ONE specific card, there will be other decks that you struggle against. If you played ELO, you would know that a balanced deck is needed to succeed. A balanced will not always counter a card like Raven, especially (most importantly) when she is surrounded by cards like Glover, Sabia, Thormund. Use your damn head and find a way to pass 1207 ELO.
Score is just something to brag about. It doesn't give you anything but that, and it ain't proof that you're a pro. Just look at the wave of QQs we have here, saying that x card is 50/50 (Raven isn't , even with Milena-ish cards ffs), and always trying to find some Y card to cry over. So glad the staff don't listen to them, or then UR would be a place full of 12 year olds doing mindless complaining of any cards in any mode (or is this already happening?). I bet there are players who are way smarter than any elo player, but just don't wanna play the mode, because they just don't want to.
And a deck made to beat one card doesn't exist. I thought we had 8 cards so we can counter many cards, even if it's not their speciality to counter a certain specific card, and this is something aplied for any mode ever, but who am I to question the insanity of players.
" I bet there are players who are way smarter than any elo player"
because ELO is now a way to measure intelligence?
I've only got over 1300 ELO once which is why I never provided my opinion on the bans here because someone who regularly achieves a top 100 score would have a better insight as to what cards are op and what cards aren't.
So Bac tbh I think your argument is invalid.
It's like saying a white belt's input is more valuable than a black belt's at karate.
Or "they could be better than them if they did karate."
I mean that's such a small minded view point.