I noticed when they limited 5* to one in a deck a lot many cards became unbanned.
cause you only could have one so no chance of over usen high powerful cards.
I wonder should we limit 3* or 4* to so many in a deck as well?
it worked for 5* really well. an I see way more different types of decks now with just that 5*.
like limit the decks to only 3 (3*) in a deck
limit the decks to 2 (4*) in a deck would that force players to really build different decks. seems like it limits player but actually forces them to think of the cards to use a bit harder. what they wont to use.
an thought on this?
" limit the decks to 2 (4*) in a deck would that force players to really build different decks. seems like it limits player but actually forces them to think of the cards to use a bit harder. what they wont to use."
if you limit stars it makes people think less since the base will almost always be the same...
Well no matter what any type 1 players have a limit of 25* deck's so limiting them to only have 3 (3*)
or 2 (4*) cards in a deck they can still reach 25* decks or lower.
more detail limit players to 2 (4*) cards max in a deck.
can unbanned many 4* cards cause with the ,limit of 2 only they have to pick witch 2 no more 3-4 (4*) decks with 1(3*) an 3 (2*) as fillers.
if they limit 3 (3*) makes them use 5* 4* an 2*.
that's why they limited (5*) so player could not make a 2 (5*) with 4 (3*) an 2 (2*) for easy ko's.
an the limit wont hurt type 2 to much either.
still can make a 30 star decks with 1(5*) an a limit on (3*) or (4*).
to boot maybe some more cards be unbanned cause of the limitation example: I use gheist for my examples cause the clan I know best. Can unbanned toro can only have 2 (4*) so toro an methane only 2 (4*) you can have still good limits you probably use 1 (5*) now an as many 3 star an 2 star to fill in the rest.
works same for 3 (3*) were you use different cards to make a deck cause there limitation on how many. will make players pick an use different cards an would give more options then one would think.
you still can make decks of 25*-30* or more.
Though this be the last limitation on decks they could make that can help the game.
any more limit's would hurt it.
though truth be told limit 2 (4*) be best cause 4 star an 5* are the most powerful card's in the game with out a huge disadvantage to them. well for most of them. would let some banned card no longer be banned cause of this limitation so more cards to make a deck with. I don't think many see what good this dose then harm.
the limit on 3 (3*) might work out but not as sure about it as much as I am about 2 (4*).
If you but a limiter on the star values it forces you to have a single type of deck (5-4-4-3-3-2-2-2) which is deadly bad in clans with less 2* like Pussycats.
That kills variety in all forms and makes sure that only two strong 4* are overpriced as hell (and unavailable to new players as a result) and the rest are useless.
Same with 3* and 2*