This ban list was created together with the players
Striker (+ Striker Rb)
The next ELO ban list will arrive after 4 weeks.
These are the reasons why we did these changes:
All Stars: We wanted to try and restore Marina in order to give the clan a more defensive side in ELO. Striker has been banned in exchange, since the both together would have made the clan too strong.
Freaks: One among Arturo and Ramath had to go, since Freaks were played too much. We decided to pick Arturo.
Jungo: Jungo were played too much, so we decided to add ginnifer to the ban list. However, since this would have left the clan without pure defensive cards low stars, we also swapped pegh and jean.
Montana: This was the most discussed change.
This is a test: we restored spiaghi, while banning 2 strong montana cards for mono-decks, moses and avola.
We want to try and see if montana can become again a good pick for bi-clan decks.
IMPORTANT: If Spiaghi will decrease the number of montana decks in room AND if he will be again used mostly as splashed card, we reserve the right to revert this change back at any time, even before the next ban list release!
Piranas: One among smokey cr, parmabarb, ursula and lizbeth had to go, since we find the clan a bit too strong. We decided to pick Lizbeth.
Rescue: We want to test the return of a very old school card: Elvira.
In exchange we banned Reeve, the most picked 5 of the clan and the 5 with the highest winrate for Rescue.
If this change will greatly increase the number of rescue decks in room, we will check it again next time.
If this change won't change many things for the clan, reeve may return back with no trades next month.
One among Moai and Streex had to go, since Ulu Watu were played too much. We decided to pick Streex.
All the others clan: We thought their playrate and usage was fine and that they can stay as they are for another 4 weeks. Changes to them may be done next time.
We discussed other cards often in the players bans (like mama killa or rattle), but we agreed that for now you players can take care of them with your weekly votes.
Have fun guys!
edited by HD_BossKilla7 monday 10/10/2016, 13:17
Well to be completely honest i think they just need to ban Spiaghi back and forget about trying to unban op splashes without making them splashable. Also this solution is quickest and has 0 development complexity so i'm sure they'll do exact that
Well, we had spiaghi before when we were able to play 2x 5* cards, so now splash spiaghi is a little bit nerfed thing.
And generally cards are getting better, why do we care so much about splash cards when there is mama killa outside free with all these huracans?
Alright, last line before my provoked mood runs out:
"I just think that calling that "% of time" function every time you need to find out percentages is not worth resources. And maybe that function needs to be adjusted to use it because it is working only in "publish this deck" page."
Well, how do you think they're gonna ban 7-1 if they dont have methods of checking what(or at least how many) cards belong to what clans in deck?
Elvira will probably replace buckler or anita or slyde cr..
But look at rescue.. With campbell gone atleast 6/8 cards are 6 power...
And we have raptors sob clans and other attack clans... Still op ed? Infact i would say reeve ban was un necessary..
Mamkilla , yes , is op ed.
Marina for striker...was like a test i suppose.
Should've banned ginnifer and left jean alone or unban pegh and leave it
most people just use one or the other anyways
might as well just reban troompah or put regina and dianzi more on the voting blocks
cause we all know those 3 cards are the real reason why jungo is being over played
regina being an soa 8/6 essentially 8/8 life gapper
(courage soa isn't even a flaw since it's so easy to use anyways)
dianzi being an "olding" buba
and troompah being a 5s Rowdy Cr