Dear Clint City, the Survivor theme week is here!
Theme of the week:
Your Deck cannot contain fewer than 8 characters.
The sum of the character levels in your Deck must not exceed 25.
Your Deck cannot contain the following 13 Character(s): Kuwaka, Hewa, Kalija, Mel-T, Bumdo, El Mariachi, Mjollnirah, Caelus Cr, Miyo, Helsa, Kasaba, Fastbender, Rhizom Noel.
Your Deck cannot contain any level 1 character.
Your Deck cannot contain more than 1 level 5 character(s).
Your Deck cannot contain characters banned by staff in the ELO mode.
Your Deck cannot contain any double characters.
1st place (daily) : Lady Ametia
If you voted for another option, don’t worry, there are a bunch of theme weeks coming up this year, so there’s still time for your favorite theme to be picked!
Please don’t hesitate to tell of what you think and what kind of future theme weeks you’d like to see. Together, let’s make Survivor mode as varied and interesting as possible!
Happy gaming to you all!
edited by Mr- Cold monday 20/01, 10:34
And what? Simply browser game must use a lot of resources?) (like modern computer games? - pfff)
I told about DM for example. If the rewards were good, the mode could exist. (or these x5 Mt idea is better? - Don't think so.)
"Leaderwars will be bringing back" Emm. And?) Still can't understand what the necessity in deleting it.
Ok, I did't hear about "hackers who abused it", but it looks like nowdays bugs in the game: when you waiting opponent and your battle is going. I did not remember such troubles on the flash. Yes, we won’t fix it, we’ll better give the player to leave the battle without penalty.
Hello mate : )
One reason I may think of could be the fact that a player in EFC that wants to experiment new decks can do it in survivor EFC, since he doesn't have the 'fear' of losing a bunch of ranking points in case of losses. This will allow them to try more extravagant builds, for example including weird Leaders or shaky 5 stars cards, that they wouldn't risk otherwise.
This is the main reason why I think players who play EFC regularly decided to vote for this.
Maybe they can appear in the forum and give this statement a thumbs up or thumbs down?
It kinda reminds me of the old 'ELO practice' room, in a way. But its different (in the ELO practice room, as well as the ELO room, you also classified in points for the tournaments every 2 hours, giving you an additional reward income)
I personally preferred the other choices of the survey for the Survivor, by far, compared to this one.
But I didn't vote for it, so I can't really complain about it : (
UR staff doesn't have a magic ball, it uses surveys to try and get what people want. It's not their fault if only 40% decided to vote and the other 60% remain silent...
If you complain about the survey, they may decide it's not worth it and take it out for the next times.
Instead, let's try to come up with ideas to make sure, next time, it' 60% of the players that votes, not the 40%.
(using these numbers as an example hein, can't know for sure the percentage of people who voted, only the staff knows that)
Why should anyone who voted survivor efc begin to come with a reasoning. You can't expect anyone to do so. This voting was a anonymous voting.
I got a free guess that could be a reasoning.
The normal survivor mode have become a mode where only people with a lot clintz have success. Because a lot of deck being used in survivor either has big cards or expensive none big cards. It's mostly how the deck's look like in that mode. Also the tactic is none existing and it mostly becomes a luck mode , just like Terminus.
That's why I believe that some people thought it would be cool for one week to bring back the old T1 survivor and actually survivor in a none lucky tactical way. Where players can't just put all there expensive cease into one deck and beat none expensive deck
It isn't about resources, but technology. Flash technology is almost dead, simple like that.
Last few years you couldn't normally launch any games from website using flash - you had to allow website using flash or even do it in deeper settings.
And this year it will be completely removed from browsers.
Yea, that bug exists, but i think it's related with connection issues, anyway, they should fix it.
I think these votes are very risky, because people often vote without much thinking.
"It sounds the best, lets vote for it".
Like we had vote with new features and most people voted for "Black market".
It sounds cool, but we had no information what it actually will be.
Or when people voted for Miss Jigi for some.. reasons
I think EFC is quite popular nowadays, so probably that's why EFC survivor vote was most popular.
Both you Chaos, and you batdut make a good point. This may be the case. EFC is by far the most popular game mode and it would be logical that EFC players would vote this way if they indeed wanted to test their decks without deranking.
In this case, it kinda sucks to be a survivor player. Seeing people deciding that your favourite game mode shall become testing ground for theirs game mode.
And the point about Survivor decks being expansive and the games not very tactical (which I disagree with, personally I find T3 survi quite complex and interesting) brings us to quite a different argument. If people feel this way, maybe it's time for some weekly T3 bans.? Instead of thematic weeks keeping things fresh, let people decide what they like and don't like. As far as I dislike bannings, it could help shake the meta up a bit.
Bro please stop with this survivor theme week thing or make it another room because for some people survivor is the only mode they actually play tweaking it every week and making it something else causes people to have some else to not play? like what made you think this is a good idea whatsoever? I don't understand this at all. if a person wanted to play efc let them go play efc there's already a limit to the different game modes already. please just chill with the gimmicks
Grizo - I agree with him.
Replacement for themed survivor - stupidity.
Chaos - I doubt they would like to test decks that they would not normally play in EFC ... maybe if there were no Lady Ametia awards I would believe it.
And so we have EFC survivor so that the best in EFC get the card in both modes - this is how it looks.
The same with tournaments - since the introduction of the mission on Lady Ametia, player growth is palpable ... but I think that immediately after the end of this mission, all those who suddenly appeared back in UR will soon disappear as soon as they appeared.