sure freaks has a 1 time bonus
but that has many advantages as well as some disadvantages(Im not gonna list them because they arent gonna be my point)
but skeelz basically only has an ability and while their ability is a for sure thing most likely so is your opponents abilty and they also have the bonus
so by far freaks has a better bonus
and so does pretty much every other clan
some are a little less versus skeelz(but they for the most part equal skeelz)
a good example of what i mean would be ghiest
ghiest are better than skeelz vs. any other clan but when they go against skeelz they are equal since they both really dont have a bonus
so yea skeelz(when it comes to bonuses) are the worst clan of them all
hopefully i didnt confuse anyone as i am very(very) horrible at explaining
You must not every play at a high level...
damage clans arnt very good at all.
i really dont like playing this game anymore infact i havnt played it competitvely for at least 2 months and only started recently playing again just cus of new clan....
if you really think "i dont know how to play" lets see who gets higher elo rating this week shall we?
Okay if you wanted to put freaks bonus on blank cards and skeelz on blank cards youre right freakz would be better.
however that is not reality.
when you play in the 1300/1400s you will see SoA ALLLL THE TIME. making this bonus relevent. unlike freakz which is really just bad.
so far skeelz have some cards with really amazing abilities, and im gonna guess on their last installment last week they are gonna bring out the power cards.
heres the thing, if they make the majority of skeelz abilities at least 1.5x better than bonuses and give them good stats, then it compensates for the blank bonus against SOME cards. sandro and 2 cost +16 atk chick are 2 great examples.
i've already stated skeelz bonus is bad before simply because their 1st release gave them subpar cards, but their bonus becomes REALLY good the majority of them metagame is using SOA and skeelz abilities are strong like sandro or the +16 atk chick.
Yes yes yes freaks has worst bonus before yo u argue w/me look
freaks are one of best bluffer clan and their bonuses can be annoying
and so are the damge clans all the clans excpet
while skeelz bonus do nothing to help them get thorugh their ablity EX.
they can be devestaing ay jay hits you 3 life left basically any cards can ko you you have to reley on luck to see which of the remiang cards will attack you.....
how ever thier bonus helps thier ablity but nothing else
sure skeelz have 90% working reducers +attack +damge +life etc...
but if they got nothing to help them win the battles its point less
more over loads of skeelz ablity don't work 100% of time you have to either win or loe to gain the ablity if they were 100% they could have considered formidable (i fought them lots of time in elo last week most player didn't win against my ghiest deck b/c of revenge and confidence not activating) sure you have to see how they will act when you thorw a cards but they can be really predictable if you play well
you can know if they are going for revenge or confidence or see if they will use confidence to activate revenge
un less skeelz get either more battle focus ablity or amazing damge or bluffing ablity they wil have hard time survivng meta playing.
also to ghiest thing they are just another SOB clan against SOA clan nothing different except liem being a full stop
and like lawless says they could work well better in half deck
the only way that Freaks could be "remade" is to max their bonus to a minimum of 1 or to a minimum of 2.
Bonuses should be bonuses, why call it a bonus if other cards from different clans would have their "bonus".
the bonus of Skeelz is ok.
the problem is you wouldn't always encounter Roots/Gheist SOA.
especially Roots, since Shakra and Ratanah are high-contenders to being banned per week.
plus, (except Danae, Sasha, Tomas and Chiara), i could say they're weak against +/- attack/power clans.
i would rather use them for fun than for ELO.