sunday 29/01/2012

Yeah, I'm starting to see that to be the case. I'm still trying to find an appropriate replacement for her though. Thanks for the comment Goatmanji!

saturday 28/01/2012

Deck layout is too risky, once your strategy is broken it's permanently broken. I don't like defensive level 5s, but that's a personal opinion. I would say Dwan to snowflake is better and, Nelow to Dagg.

friday 27/01/2012

Hey guys, what do you think about this deck for ELO?

deleted

Thank you for all the help. I was not expecting this much aid.

If you put a 2* on Ernst, and put that * you've earned on Jaxx or methane (wardom, xu52), or on Dolly-klawz (draheera), the deck look better IMO.

Ok deck. I would personally change Vholt to charlie as the extra damage can be more helpfull then the extra - damage, Candice to muze as posion in a pussy cats deck is very usefull, Jayzel to Cherry due to her high power and ability which can win you the game. If you want to keep vholt then i would still change the other cards ive mentioned.

p.s if you want to make a link which is just the deck name, like this meawwwwrrr elo !, then you only copy the "preset=2171328" and change the = to :

But in low pillz fights sargh can help you more and if you get hit by a card with stop opp ability ability or a stop all then sarghs 7 power is more helpfull. Sargh can also help against other - power ability cards. But its a personall choice and you don't have to change it.

Interesting deck. smiley

thursday 26/01/2012

Interesting deck. I would personally change Rubie to Pallack.

wednesday 25/01/2012

Lol at post 11, you know you might be right, if I look to other posts from this player like

http://www.urban-rivals.com/community/forum/?mode=viewsubject&forum_page=0&id_subject=2021208&subject_page=0#answers

if you look at the general tone of his posts and the way he displays his own problems, he really is a forum troll, and a pretty fat one judging from how he was "fed" in the other topic and this... personally I would really close this kind of topics

from wikipedia

"In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion"

With the sentinel low part, I reached 1424 last week (with Vortex), 1370 (with Uppers). With freaks low part, I reached almost 1400 too. The most important it's I get the feeling that those deck are strongest than "big deck" - Junkz/Berserk, Monta/berserk, Rescue...

Few words for the history. Raven and I know well this kind of deck. They were dominating ELO tournament when Graksmxxt was not forbidden. Sakrohm had 3 good cards (Uranus-Grakst, and caciope 1 for low part, Skrumxxt for big part), and those deck with 3 sakrohm were very very strong. Strongest than mono rescue with Alec and Marco, or Bangers Montana with Lyse, or Pussy-stars-Eyrick, or Gheist-Morphun-splash. When grakst was bannished, the 5/3 was not a good choice. But now, it changes, the choice of cards is very large (so you've got more possibilities to make some goods low parts, or put some really good cards in your strong part (as sentinels, with the new blood Morgan, Eebiza or Flanagan for a Junkz's strong part)), with no over-rated cards (so drawing bonus is most important).

It's why, IMO, you should consider 5/3 as a good eventuality for your next deckbuilding smiley

tuesday 24/01/2012

A better way to fix rage bans imho is to not allow them in the first place. Either have a ban cap of 2 cards/week per clan or dont allow people to place all their votes into one clan, i.e. if you voted for spyke, you cant vote for the other cards from berserk. Way too many people obviously put 2/2/2 or more into the 3 berserk cards. Even without spyke, I would have loved to halfdeck berserk simply cuz I like em. I did it before spyke was released. But now I cant use berserk for the entire week, even tho Lola and Elvis are nowhere near broken.

monday 23/01/2012

Interesting deck. I would personally change Alexei to Desmond and Gianfranco to Kang.

Ok deck. I would personally change Eadh to Mawpin and Orlok to Pan.

Interesting deck. I would personally change Timmy to sargh.

sunday 22/01/2012

deleted

I agree with KV Raven.

It's literally impossible to remove completely the luck factor of the game. Even if it were removed, then everyone would play the same strategy and same deck... Another thing that makes players fascinated by any TCG is the "countering" element of the game. Every deck will have a weakness, and the most all-rounded deck will not be the strongest.

For Urban Rivals. if you can well-predict all possible outcomes since Round 1, you can most likely win the game if your opponent can't.

Tromorh to jiro, as pill manipulation doesn't fit in with junkz, bevause both pill maniplations and berserk are more geared to opening and midgame, which is why I would also switch lolly to veenlye cr and eebize to haze

saturday 21/01/2012

Spyke meets Roots!

this one is one of the "standard" roots / berzerk decks, very powerful and consistent

although I like rudy, using elvis and melanie instead of rudy and kawamashi is almost always better
especially because both melanie and elvis "counter" spyke, which you will see a lot of

Change woolf and woods

wakai for woods or down grade woolf to 3* and put in a better 3* for sakrohm like ngrath woolf could be changed to any decint 3*

Create a subject