I really dont see how that makes her a "hacker"
Any SOA that effects Pirana is precious, though. Most clans are lucky if they have more than 2-3 SoA at all, and the chances of facing them is low enough (and manipulating around them when they do show up) that I think it's worth the tradeoff if you're saving up for cards with a visible improvement (Lizbeth!) rather than a handful more of rounds barely won. Maybe if Raeth had 6 Damage or 8 Power I'd agree he's undeniably worth 7k, but he's just slacking a bit. Unless you're pairing him with Lizbeth for a 2HKO - OP isn't, I guess - Coleridge or even Scubb/Sting/Sheryl are almost completely as good. I feel like Taljion fills the attack manip slot more than enough, though I wouldn't say no to a new Pirana with -atk, like, say, Crunchy...
Tula's not always the greatest option. Coleridge attracts SoA but it's on her like white on rice, and there's a disturbing amount of 7 Power cards with atk/pow manip. Amiral Coco is excellent though, and I've dropped my Hawkins Noel for him - no plans to replace with Hawkins. Puff definitely pulls his weight.
But by this point it's just semantics. Any of the suggested decks are good and viable, preferences like these are just what keep the game interesting.
Ah yes, the impotence of post 23.
post 29 however, is a pleasant and logical request that is worthy of respect.
Well, i guess the last 3 pages have strayed quite a bit from the original focus, so let us let the thread die as not to perpetuate EA's attention-seeking success (no such thing as bad press they'd say) xP
+1 what they're saying.
making a half deck with cherry and some pussycats would also help you go all pills on a strong healer then just DR-ing the enemy while healing to maximize your mission completion potential. You might not win the battle, but you'll finish the mission faster
Keep ELO, add League. Idk much about FR though.
Lol, Aktara07 might want to reread the original post....
2) I agree on the card filters, but the other two could be left off. Personally I don't see any reason at all as to why the mobile app should have absolutely everything on it.
4) Quite clearly an iDevice-only complaint as this exists on Android.
5) See above.
Personally the biggest complaint is that there's no way of turning off the free pill on mobile. Which doesn't sound like a big deal, but it does mess up my math often enough.
Though I really really hate hate HATE this idea, if you guys are going to make a new ad, here's one thing that will give you lots of fame.... Or infamy. Make it really strange, unique, or funny that it goes viral that everyone in the Internet talks about it.
Remember how Op- Op- Op- GODDANG I REFUSE TO MENTION THAT STUPID VID!
....Uhm, remember how "that video" went DISGUSTINGLY and unbelievably popular?
Yeah, you can make a tv ad featuring a dancing Kolos who ends the ad with a catchy tagline, for example.
I can't see LARPers being their own clan, but I can see one or two joining a medieval clan that was somehow transported here from the past.
You need to complete an offer that gives you 5 credits at once.
Anything under 5 doesn't give you access.
I agree so much,
Please give me 10,000,000 clintz
Does anyone here experience the trial pay survey intro error? I cant even start a survey to get a free credit. And i think its only available on a certain country.
Didn't stop squirtroll though!
I was going to say Frozn - Vortex, but Hula_Daisy beat me to it. On the other hand, I think Pussycats could also work well with Frozn, reducing damage while they lose so Frozn's clan bonus can activate.
Cheers thanks man lol I can close this one up
Taljion for Goldie (Taljion has a 2 pt penalty which is very unfair, can be overlooked)
Ulrich for Wheeler (Ulrich is Elo banned but does not have a DT penalty)
Sheryl for Cyan.
There is a server delay sometimes, your clintz will arrive shortly
That just shows you what cards have the most votes that week, but not necessarily if they're getting banned next week or staying. People usually vote ban though, so it's safe to assume about 80% of anything with over 5% of votes is getting temp banned next week xD.
There's a certain time when it told you "x is staying, for now", "x is threatened, but under 5%" and "x is going, for now", rather than "x's trend is hidden this week". I think it's right after the elo week is over and a few votes have been cast that it's like that, and after that, they all go hidden