Thats the point of this week, no SOA
I want them to have a no attack manip bonus week
Still I can imagine all the millions of Montana, Rescue, Uppers, Sakrom, Sentinal and Junkz players would have big hissy fits and quit UR
also banning 6 clans would be a bit overkill - sitll one can dream
I figured these cards should come off pretty solidly in ELO this week with SOA out of the way.
Power, Attack and pillZ (Elo)
Murray's pimpin' party!
A lot of DR, a lot of life gain. If Jautya or Ditha hits, it pretty much seals the deal when played properly...
Yeah SOB and all not everyone is going SOB some how.
Now this should be real deadly next week...
Please rate and comment!
Oh, and I have Lea for Krash, you should have Lea, there's never enough of Lea in a rescue deck
ELO Week 47 Sak
Suggestions and comments appreciated.
I would appreciat any feedback or opinions for this deck
I like the deck for, however, I see a problem. SoA week will be flooded with Damage reducers (hence the banning of all DRs the week after), so your 2HKOs could get ruined quite easily, which would make playing La Junta fairly difficult. A really good La Junta deck, just La Junta is going to have a lot of trouble next week (or so I think).
Ok so I'm thinking about the SoA ban next week, so I have come up with a Piranas/Sakrohm deck that has a fair amount of SoB and Damage reduction and lots of potential for 2HKOs. Take a look.
The general idea is to open with Selma and then have 2-3 cards that can finish the 2HKO in your hand, forcing the opponent to pill hard against you. Then you can easily soak up some pillz and damage or pill yourself to finish them off.
The secondary KO (which would generally be if you didn't draw Selma) would be to go for a first turn 5 damage, a second or third turn 5 damage and then finish with Nimestiec.
Hawkins vs Tula was probably my hardest decision to make because neither had a real role in the deck other than a 2 star filler, I went with Hawkins in the end because it allows me to get rid of a few pillz if i'm lucky (if only Bonnie Ld was already out )
Anyway any advice is welcome.
Here are three elo decks I'm trying out. Rate and help me pick which one to use
Thanks for that termina, yes I meant rolph
The problem with mono decks is all their big guns with Support abilities get destroyed by SOA (Skeelz being the exception but Skeelz's 5* characters are disasters in ELO). If you take something like Jungo, that clan has a split personality- it has Support but it also has Stop characters- so which do you run? So that is a huge problem.
I like 5-3 split decks. 5 characters gives you plenty of stability without relying on Support: characters. 3 is fine for clans where the bonus doesn't matter all the time (Pussycats, Vortex, Skeelz, Junkz, Sakrohm) or that you don't want to draw 3 characters ever (Freaks). a 3 character Pussycat splash of Yayoi, Britany and Cassio (8*), Skeelz of Chiara, Redra and Liam (7*), or Vortex of C Wing, Neloe and Onyx (7*) brings a lot of power at bargain efficiency. While the Vortex bonus is nice enough that you wont be hurt for going to 4 characters, adding a 5th character to a clan that has a great bonus more than makes up for it. For instance I would never play Uppers with less than 5 characters.
I played a Sentinal / Ulu deck with 4 2* in it, and it's a winnable draw:
Lehane, Tobbie, Aurelia (who should now be replaced by new blood) and Taigo.
All of them have huge power plus attack manipulation, and I've won all 4 rounds with them before.
Your milage may vary though, especially depending on which clan you face.
This week im adding a new type of deck this deck is my nightmare im glad im using it and not facing it as it has every element i hate soa doesnt affect it at all as abilitys are mainly for show sob will only get you so far pill low and win easy with prisoner x
Now Gheist aren´t flooding the room this deck got me to 1365 by now