This is not elo specific but just a format wide piece of advice
look at the hands and decide what match ups you want to happen and which match ups you want to avoid
now look at it from the opponents perspective and determine what match ups he wants to set up and which ones he wants to avoid
based on the information above, start figuring out some of the mathematical advantages you may have
move on from there
that is the basic principle of playing this game well. In the past couple of years this has become quite a bit harder with the arrival of more devastating cards.
@Frog: I'm not such a good player to do that lol
Ella is underrated.
I...dislike that. Incredibly weak to SoA.
Crazy Carlo, Marina, Oxana, Mulligan, Randy, Karen, Jessie, Augustino
This is much more solid in my opinion. You won't get many amazing draws, but you won't get any bad ones. And you'll do far better against SoA.
I'm using wyre currently. That's why I added the second part.
Lol I think next week Imma go tryhard
Thanks, I made it. I'm gonna close this now.
If you have Valentina Ld, Dayton --> Valentina Ld
Use Maurice, Nellie, Josephine and Kazayan plus Gail Ld, Jose Star/Wendel and Saltsberg with your preferred 3* and I'd say your chances of 1400 this week will be significantly increased.
If u have beck u can make it even better..
Plunk+Chiara -> Beck+Nellie
The best and cheapest are not the same thing. Under 5k you don't have that many options
Thanks guys! Still getting used to it, I don't really play anything else than ELO and ocasionally survivor ELO, that's why I'm asking.
Took a look through my collection and damn I've got really good cards.
See you ingame!
It's worth noting Gheist are due for a new release pretty soon since B16 Sestra is about to be phased out of Newbloods, which would leave one Gheist in Newbloods, and it looks like every clan has a minimum of 2 in those packs.
Yes This is exactly what I thought when I saw xDLol's s**tposting.There's something to be said for reducing the range of players you can play against to a smaller difference from your own score to reduce impact if you're at 1350+ and lose to a furious Konrad/Lola combo, but not for banning both due to a perfectly valid (albeit risky) strategy which requires some skill to pull off. Nice to see some evidence which proves that guy wrong
Xingshu is just too good for what she is and is stupidly unfair
I think ur should just release another 4/5* skeelz that is useful but isn't xingshu and then get rid of her so skeelz are still viable
The big issue with them is they'll never be a half deck, it's just not worth putting 4 of them in your deck when you can use 3 and guarantee the other clans better bonus more
It sucks but skeelz are destined for 2/3 card splashes or mono
No it's not. But you'll find it difficult to make up a single table that covers everything all at once.
And on that note...
Hehe, now my skeelz will rule. Well, you should of voted.