thursday 12/02/2015

@soiuko
Xingshu is just too good for what she is and is stupidly unfair
I think ur should just release another 4/5* skeelz that is useful but isn't xingshu and then get rid of her so skeelz are still viable
The big issue with them is they'll never be a half deck, it's just not worth putting 4 of them in your deck when you can use 3 and guarantee the other clans better bonus more

It sucks but skeelz are destined for 2/3 card splashes or mono

No it's not. But you'll find it difficult to make up a single table that covers everything all at once.

monday 09/02/2015

YES BAN HIM

Hehe, now my skeelz will rule. Well, you should of voted.

Damn it,,,, i confused with the threads... smiley

saturday 07/02/2015

Of course I have scooty and sabia. Thans for the hep, closing this now.

tuesday 03/02/2015

Http://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=2802312 Is under 100k and is similar to what I run most weeks.

friday 23/01/2015

You could go Mono Skeelz as well.

Dont splash Xingshu pls... roots so common... Malicia,Dianna,even Mercury> a no bonus Xingshu

tuesday 20/01/2015

The killer clans in Splitz this week is are Pussycats Allstars Jungo ... La junta and Bangers as Splits and of course Uppers and Sentinel are always on top so..

monday 12/01/2015

OPG spams worse than I do lol

I really wanna see the stats though, since I'd at least like to make better informed ban decisions. No matter how you look at it, it's good for the health of ELO.

sunday 11/01/2015

saturday 10/01/2015

Sakrohm is only for half decks.

Toro is irreplaceable

deleted

Pretty good huh

friday 02/01/2015

The problem with mono-kitties is that they aren't very consistent. They have plenty of good cards... really good cards, really, but you're going to get into a lot of 50/50s because all you're doing is trying to gap people. It's fun but it's not effective if you want to get 1300+. Most of their cards are difficult to win rounds with if the opponent decides not to let you win that round so rather than trying to maneuver the opponent you're just kinda guessing when is a good time to use 6 pills or more. And god help you if you guess wrong.

Malicia is a beast. But now adays there are so many good cards... Lear Barduh, Campbell, El Matador, SoB clans, FPC or Berzerk bonuses... the PC bonus just isn't what it used to be. And you're left with 'good' cards and not enough attack manipulation. I'm not saying Diana isn't a beast but if somebody uses Mona on it or something... you have a good chance of losing the round AND being 2 pills down. One wrong guess... boom, devastating loss.

thursday 01/01/2015

Clan context does matter. Lehane is better than Lea given any context. Head to head... -v- other cards... inside the clan... outside the clan. It's 8 power -v- 6 power. The only context in which Lea is better than Lehane is in a holding context. And the context of this discussion is to subjugate the 'olding' strategy.

I don't mean to say "Because ____, then ____." but I thought it was a good parallel.

Your Judge Scare -v- Sledg parallel is a good one too but in my opinion Rescue has already had enough cards banned. I'm just saying Sentinel could stand to lose Lehane. There is obviously a bit of a double standard going on when EVERY card we've agreed parallels a Rescue card is unbanned while every Rescue example is banned. And why? Because a 6 powered card needs to use 1 extra pill? Meh.

monday 29/12/2014

No its okay you are helpful. Thanks guys!

My best card is Askai but he's banned. I'll save up and switch out rosa then

Create a subject