tuesday 03/02/2015

Http://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=2802312 Is under 100k and is similar to what I run most weeks.

friday 23/01/2015

You could go Mono Skeelz as well.

Dont splash Xingshu pls... roots so common... Malicia,Dianna,even Mercury> a no bonus Xingshu

tuesday 20/01/2015

The killer clans in Splitz this week is are Pussycats Allstars Jungo ... La junta and Bangers as Splits and of course Uppers and Sentinel are always on top so..

monday 12/01/2015

OPG spams worse than I do lol

I really wanna see the stats though, since I'd at least like to make better informed ban decisions. No matter how you look at it, it's good for the health of ELO.

sunday 11/01/2015

saturday 10/01/2015

Sakrohm is only for half decks.

Toro is irreplaceable

deleted

Pretty good huh

friday 02/01/2015

The problem with mono-kitties is that they aren't very consistent. They have plenty of good cards... really good cards, really, but you're going to get into a lot of 50/50s because all you're doing is trying to gap people. It's fun but it's not effective if you want to get 1300+. Most of their cards are difficult to win rounds with if the opponent decides not to let you win that round so rather than trying to maneuver the opponent you're just kinda guessing when is a good time to use 6 pills or more. And god help you if you guess wrong.

Malicia is a beast. But now adays there are so many good cards... Lear Barduh, Campbell, El Matador, SoB clans, FPC or Berzerk bonuses... the PC bonus just isn't what it used to be. And you're left with 'good' cards and not enough attack manipulation. I'm not saying Diana isn't a beast but if somebody uses Mona on it or something... you have a good chance of losing the round AND being 2 pills down. One wrong guess... boom, devastating loss.

thursday 01/01/2015

Clan context does matter. Lehane is better than Lea given any context. Head to head... -v- other cards... inside the clan... outside the clan. It's 8 power -v- 6 power. The only context in which Lea is better than Lehane is in a holding context. And the context of this discussion is to subjugate the 'olding' strategy.

I don't mean to say "Because ____, then ____." but I thought it was a good parallel.

Your Judge Scare -v- Sledg parallel is a good one too but in my opinion Rescue has already had enough cards banned. I'm just saying Sentinel could stand to lose Lehane. There is obviously a bit of a double standard going on when EVERY card we've agreed parallels a Rescue card is unbanned while every Rescue example is banned. And why? Because a 6 powered card needs to use 1 extra pill? Meh.

monday 29/12/2014

No its okay you are helpful. Thanks guys!

My best card is Askai but he's banned. I'll save up and switch out rosa then

friday 26/12/2014

Yeah i thought at much about the Mono-Huracan deck. ive paired them with Vortex and its worked pretty well, but i think ill try them out with Frozn next

wednesday 24/12/2014

Gibson was great. The change from 12 to 14 life made him too fat to fit into a deck

tuesday 23/12/2014

8 messages

I'm not saying she's definitely the next Zhu Tang. That was a very underrated card that was just more recently noticed as an OP/gamechanger type card. Not saying Ellie is going to be the next OP card, by no means is she OP, but she can change the game. And for a 3* that's a lot.

She (obviously) closely resembles Anita who has the same thing going for her, but Ellie's SOA allows her to go thru more often than Anita.

Not saying she's OP or anything like that. She's a good card (underrated IMO), but ultimately, how many more Roots can they ban before your options dwindle down to the same 4 cards as everyone else (Curlix - when not banned, Rico, Tuck? Treeman? Lilly? The options Roots have right now is atrocious). When Tuck is worth almost 19k you know something is wrong.

monday 22/12/2014

It seems to me that you are frustrated with ELO when you submit a change for consideration that totally revamps the entire process. It would SEEM as though you want things to be different... which implies that you don't like the way things are.

It's not even an idea that would bring about your desired end-result. That's what makes it so ludicrous. Granted-- most people wouldn't have room for another 5* if they were using a leader, but there are plenty of Vermaire's and Konrad's out there that really don't need a leader to have their back.

Somebody with Eyrik throws out Konrad in the first round and you either gotta use like 9 pills against him or just hold. Which requires some minimal thinking, I guess, but more or less just nervous guessing. When your decision in a single round (the first round, particularly,) can mathematically lose the game for you I call that guessing. I call that a bad idea.

I mean there is a game mode that makes use of the style of play you're suggesting... you know what it is? Leaderwars bud. You're confusing "the leaders are balanced against eachother," with "the leaders were adjusted to fit ELO." Most of them were made STRONGER... which, you pretend to understand, but fail to apply to your original theory.

Vholt+Pussycats=OH MY GOD. I mean do you really consider it strategy to sit there and guess which round they're going to blow their pill supply in? Is that not the EXACT problem that you're trying to fix?

sunday 21/12/2014

Lawl, same reaction for me too. I was gonna troll with a mono-PC derp defeat deck and Vholt, but I guess the staff read my mind

thursday 18/12/2014

Dat Fei, though.

Mona, Waller, Angelo then pick one of these...

Edd Cr
Verrmaire
Don

What? No Spiaghi? Not my style to use a defeat card that cannot be used offensively. "But, Yellow, what about that sweet attack manip?" You mean like what Rescue and Huracan has not to mention Uppers almost matches it with a superior no-pillz required minimum. Mona Vs. Nellie? How many pillz does she need to climb over 8? 4+the freebie.

Create a subject