saturday 22/05/2010

Imho they're slightly inferior in DT cuz you don't get freebie roundwins when you 0 pill, like attack manips do. Less roundwins = less battle points even if you win the game.

I think this is everyone:

"+x life per damage"

Ambrose Cr

La Junta:

Anita (courage based)

Dr Saw





All Stars:
Loma Noju

Fang Pi Clan:
Seldnor Cr

Cassio Cr

Manfred (confidence based)


do you guys have the same problem
playing in ELO or Survivor
normally should be non random
I sometimes loose battles when I have more attack then my opponent
it then shows that the fight is random...

First of all get 3 more ulu watu, stanly doesn't hold up on his own, get rid of fifty,lennox,sleam get lulabee,nanook and miss lulabee

friday 21/05/2010

OK, the people have spoken.


"You will have a harder time."
Doing what?

"it would defeat the purpose"
What purpose?

"with 30 stars you can make strong decks like those in type two now"
That's why it would still be T2. Still you see some decks today that couldn't be created then.

"One star gap makes a big difference"
The exact same thing happens nowadays, nothing changed there.

"Type 2 DTs would become less effective because you would gain less BPs per battle"
First one i find reasonable, i understand why some players would not like this. I wouldn't mind it though, you would still face "monster hands" every now and then but not those "impossible" survivor hands. For DT players 30* is more than enough to build a deck but they wouldn't face as many low level players with lots of 5* cards as they face today, because most of them would play T3 instead.

"then you'll have a format which is pretty much unused (Type 2)"
In my opinion the new T2 format would not become unused as i still think it would offer the best (good solid deck)/(battle points won) relation.

It looks like most of you didn't like my idea very much but i would still like to hear more about it. smiley
By the way sorry for such a long post.

Baldovino is pretty much what I wanted, glad to see that. Going back to my original statement about how Freaks need a pair like Hawk and Lehanne, I put Baldovino roughly on level with Hawk. Maybe I got my wish. I certainly don't expect Baldovino to be elo banned but he may very well make Freaks appear on the list and that will be the sign that they have overcome their greatest problems as a clan. All in all, I'm cautiously optimistic.

There are several pros and cons to having splash cards, mono-decks and half-decks.

For mono-decks, your bonus activates 100% of the time. That's definitely a big plus. Support based abilities/bonuses also gain a huge boost from being in a mono-deck, as they will have their full potential out all the time, while in a half deck you risk drawing 1/2/3 cards from that clan and the ability will be slightly weaker, if not very much so. However, mono-decks means that you have to put up with the weird habits of that particular clan, for lack of a better word. For example, a mono-Uppers means you will have to bear with the weaker 2* cards that the Uppers has; admittedly, the Uppers 2* are average if not below that. Same goes for the Ulu Watu.

Half decks run the risk of having no bonuses for certain cards, if you draw a 3-1 split. Support abilities are also much weaker generally. However, half decks means you get to combine the strengths of two clans together. For example, as stated earlier, the Uppers has weak 2*. But the Nightmare/Piranas have wonderful 2* cards. So a possible choice would be to combine the two, using low-starred Piranas and putting in high-powered Uppers.

Splash cards serve a different purpose in that they are mostly fillers. These are cards that will operate well enough without their bonus, and serve sufficiently with just ability alone. Spiaghi is one such card; Lehane is another. They are (most of the time) there to make space for other bigger, nastier cards.

@Battery: ohhh..that's why they released 2 pussycats and 2 skeelz during December-Januarysmiley

thursday 20/05/2010

What do ya think about my new deck?

I like going up against no le veled cards it means i complete missions quicker.


It was directed at the same guy you directed at, cause i know you already know very well everything i've just posted. and the cases i talked about are if you use mono piranas in T2, or if you use a strange mono deck with 2 4* cards( like me)

Uhm yeah you should just get that +2 points subclavian also in dt's smiley
+2 points > a few miliseconds

@art- Ok. But I don't have enough Clintz for Mona. But I will.
Changed Sharon to Donnie

Put the mouse over collection then some tabs should come down and one says public presets click on that

wednesday 19/05/2010

What's the point of having a bonus to protect your bonus? Cancelling SOB? Then you might as well -not- have a bonus. Either way, SOB will fail to work against you.

I am a new player and I don't have the #1 answer but I do have the #2.
#2- The one that goes first wins. Or the one with the LOWER star count.

Bonuses are only activated from having to cards from the same clan, with this idea you are only allowd one bonus, and with only one bonus you will not get far, I suggest you go for your two favourite clans and stick with them, when you get more money you can try swapping one of those clans for the other but only stick to 2 clans max

tuesday 18/05/2010

If you have alot of money Bryan is great but if ur low on money stick to the second page with cards like Chiro, Dacote, Archible
or you could be lucky like me and get Emeth in a pack win ur a level 10 noob!
yeah thats right be jealous

I generally go with cool attitude due to the high amount of expensive uncommons. Also I hate getting new blood packs, you only got 4 out of 35 (not counting rarity) to get the new cards and any common cards, which is 2/3 of a new blood pack, you get are going be worthless. Course all packs are random so every pack has a chance of giving you 300 clintz to 20k+ clintz.

Create a subject