wednesday 17/04/2013

Ya apparently this deck is still good this week. lost my 1st match in elo(used eddy and futoshi ld) and went back to it and havent lost its 18 wins 0 losses and 2 draws now.
21:15 Elo you won by timeout against GL-MATT, ¡Los Guerreros Legendarios! (16-9): 1078 ELO
21:06 Elo you crushed IamViz, Limit Break (14-0): 1066 ELO
20:59 Elo you won by timeout against - arcangel -, {{{{{ OZ . EVOLUCION }}}}} (13-3): 1049 ELO
20:53 Elo you won by forfeit against DanCollin, Wächter des Zwielichts (15-12): 1027 ELO
20:50 Elo you won by forfeit against 0 Nomi, ₪ BúnKer ₪ (16-11): 1011 ELO

Shine Bright Like A Diamond.

Rate and comment please. If you could recommend any tips and suggestions, you are most welcome to do so. Thank you for you time! Please don't rate down. smiley

tuesday 16/04/2013

Rate and Comment Please!!!

Raving Shinobi

I agree with Wisesmiley
And most important change Wanda to Ivana

Hahaha just making sure someone sees it

Interesting deck. i would personally change Dalhia Cr to Selma (extra damage and I prefer + pillz to - pillz).

IMO, uppers may have some completely beast high * card, but even though their lower stars are weaker, some of them are very usable and they are usually not elo banned
: Oxen, Wendel, Jose Star

IMO: I have been playing Bangers since 07, my main back in 07 was Freaks and Bangers ( Ironic isn't it?)
Bangers don't have some unique abilities, as most people complain, all of bangers 2* and 3* are pretty much the same

IE: Graff = Randal
Juicy Lord = B Ball
Luccio = Bennie

Not only that, they don't have decent 7-8 power cards. Most of them rely on their bonus to reach the 8 power mark.
Unlike Ulu Watu, where their cards already come in 7 - 8 power. ( Heck Gaia is so old but already have 7 power )

Freaks, like what the oracle said, relies too much on their first round.
I'm pretty sure the dev's plan was create a clan with high power and low damage but most damage comes from the bonus, but sometimes you won't always get a free pass in the first round. IMO : Freaks lack manipulation and damage. Mostly damage.

Like pussycats whose main role is supposed to soak damage, they have some great cards with high damage too.

How is this for a half deck, deleted

Yeah watch out for all stars, deleted

monday 15/04/2013

@ ghelas
Indeed Ulrich does DR La Junta and FPC for 6 but then the Piranas as a whole is pretty weak against them.
Isatis vs colerige
wyre vs buba
Thormund vs puff
Bryan vs Kristin
Laura vs Cyan
Gatline / Brianna vs Raeth
Milena vs morgane
Pilzken vs Selma
sabia vs (oops no Dr for Piranas)
Dugan vs (oops no Dr for Piranas)
And then Theres Raven the OHKO

I don't think La Junta should worry about Ulrich anyway.

sunday 14/04/2013

Off topic now

You didn't help! That's the joke! smiley

Who's being arrogant?

9 game losing streak happened - 120 elo
fight all way back to 1350s, couldn't break into top 100
got other stuff to do, so i'm done. see you next week

saturday 13/04/2013

Brittany huh.......................................

Save your pills for Diana smiley

Well, I only like to use 1 2* in Pussycats, and that is Lucy.

Montana is not that hard. It's either they don't draw Avola and most likely lose, or they draw Avola and misplay. They're not too smart. You can try uppers if you really have a hard time, here's what I made this week: Lady Diana

friday 12/04/2013

Thanks for that! smiley
I have once considered that too but it would weaken my deck if I'm up against roots/gheist.

thursday 11/04/2013

wednesday 10/04/2013

AmberRed1994 could u tell me the final touches

Yeah. Switched to Graff, and then alternating with this deck to beat Montanas: Lady Diana.

Create a subject