It work like this : winning 10 games give you 10 points lose 1 game = - 1351351 points, all that to end up getting half of the prize for someone with 500 points less than you
OK thanks, time to beat these hardcore Frozn
Ah, Freaks + Pussycats used to be a very popular combination back then with Baldovino/Diana/Liona/Clover/3* Charlie/Esmeralda/Ella/Shazam
But now, I feel like Freaks are better paired with another clan- like you mentioned Ulu Watu instead of Pussycats- since back then Freaks cards had little damage and relied solely on their poison, and Pussycats could provide the life gapping that Freaks need. But now Freaks has cards like Arturo, Antoinette, and Ramath. they might be better paired with another defensive clan like Roots for that SoA that Pussycats can't provide..
But I might do Freaks / Pussycats in Polit Area with Sera M1/ Liona / Madelone / Choko / Clover / Shazam / Wonald / Ginger
R.I.P my clintz (Something I don't have in the first palce xD)
@nayrSlayer your completely right. on the way the point system should be tweaked you should lose less points for fighting some one lower then your zones but if you win aginst that stronger deck witch since its lower zone would be much stronger should give more points for the game if you win.
a point tweak like this would make the mode more fun but be harder for staff to do all the math. may be you lose half the points for each zone lower then you to a point.
if your zone say tower fighting a dark corner should half the points lost if you lose. double if you win cause that's one up hill battle. an odd's are you will lose with a +80% change of it being a loss.
Yea, state of features generally tested in beta sites not the replacement of mayor game mode.
Just realized this pattern. My guild mate who reached 602 won 28 points on his last match, and his current score is being shown as 28. Similarly, you won 40 points but your score is being shown as 40 so all scores are actually showing what the player won in his last match, which is why one of my friend's score is - 9
I wish they would make it if you make it were you play what 2 zones away from the zone your in
say your in zone
3- Danger zone
you are more likely to play 2- Chocomuscle ring or 4-EFC Tower has a 72% for a mach making an 28% chance match making for 1- Dark corners or 5- Polit arena that way it balance out for players much better.
I'm Lovin' It!!! because I get to use this deleted even if it is just for a Zone or two
You have to play 5 rounds a day or you will lose. at the end of the week the one with most post win's. its really simple. just make sure to play your 5 games a day or you really lose points for it.
Nobody cares , u just holded the game together , but now dead all round
Damn these Hyper Links!
Hes not but he dose prove if we nerf all the other leaders they can all be used in elo. but heavy Nerf.
john doom is not hard to beat that an he cant ko with out fury so hes not really op. hes just irritating like a rash that wont go away.
The Bangers deck I said btw is a 2/2/2/3/3/4/4/5 which looks like it would deal low damage(idk, I always feel having too much 2* would make less damage) but their 2* damage output is surprising for not being in La junta but that's just my Opinion.
I actually tried an Upper/Frozn Deck and it does well. I use Aaron, Yod, Lowki, Haaken/T-We-1 and Josephine/Maurice, Rubie/Christelle, Salstberg/2* Gina Glitt, Jose Star/Gail Ld. I would use Stompah over aaron if he was free but Aaron is actually good tbh.