192/213

Fraggle - Monday 18/05/2009, 20:40
Imperator - HK's fox on typewriters

@3M-KLL3R & @Putzo: sorry about that, we had a strange bug for a few minutes...

193/213

Fapfap - Friday 22/05/2009, 02:34
Imperator

Well i wished there could be an option for players to have 3 active elo decks,can play all and keep different elo score for each of em.And at the end of the win ur ranking would be of the one that gathered the most elo points.This way game would encourage players to play ELO more and try different changes see if they like em without risking of dropping low.Once some players reach 1350 + elo they are just playing enough matches to keep themselves in the top 100 and its kinda sucky that u cant play and train once u are about 1350.

194/213

Poison Ivy89 - Friday 22/05/2009, 13:08
Veteran - Open Casket

ELO ranking update. this time Lehane is at the number 1 spot while Hawk is right behind her and Ratahna is at the 3 spot.

195/213

JonelethStar - Friday 22/05/2009, 13:14
Guru - UpperClass

Poison Ivy: may I ask how you can make those assumptions, as the tendencies are hidden and the vote percentage doesnt follow the order you mention

196/213

Babs Hartley - Friday 22/05/2009, 20:57
Colossus - TRiNiTY

Hi, everyone. I'd just like to take this opportunity to say that the new ELO voting system is SUCK.
There should be a limit to how many times a card can be banned in a row. I'm actually considering quitting the game, because I hate not being able to play with my favorite cards.
It's also TOTALLY unfair to players who aren't rich.

197/213

JonelethStar - Saturday 23/05/2009, 21:14
Guru - UpperClass

I would like to see a system that rewards players for being creative with decks, and levels out overabuse. One option could be (and it was suggested here earlier) that clans like sentinels and uppers would get you less points in ELO for the same fight with using freaks and fpc. Say only +5 for a win with overused clans and +15 for winning with an underused clan.

The other solution I would see (but it requires some coding ) is that the most used clan of the week would get a negative bonus next week. in addition to their normal bonus. lets say -10 attack min 3 but on your cards. So each uppers or sentinel card would get +8 attack from their bonus and then lose 10 attack from their negative bonus. Which would make them a whole lot less effective in ELO effectively nerfing sentinels in ELO for that week. But this would result in them being back the next week.

198/213

Babs Hartley - Sunday 24/05/2009, 18:16
Colossus - TRiNiTY

Hmmmm, you're a smart one, Darkeagle....but that system might get a little convoluted. Remember: a lot of ppl who play this game are dumb. Take yours truly for example...

199/213

gta0004 - Sunday 24/05/2009, 20:20
Veteran

Zatman and Dorian gonna be unbanned!!!!!
Time for some -PwNgE-

200/213

iJeromiz - Monday 25/05/2009, 05:45
Master

Muahhahaha..
http://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=537973&list

201/213

Babs Hartley - Monday 25/05/2009, 09:12
Colossus - TRiNiTY

Is Hawk EVER gonna be unbanned? So ridiculous: they come out with an awesome new Sentinel card that follows on the heels of a move that renders Hawk unplayable. Hey, Admins! Move to limit consecutive card banning, PLEASE!!!