Ok.... about decks, if you dont trust each other send me your deck list by mp...by the way... if you want the pricemoney to increase then send me a card on my account as inscription fee... inscriptions are closed... we will start the tournament on monday ...i'll put the fight list on another topic... good luck people
i play my first tournament today and ended up 93 with 227 Battle points.
Maybe taking away cards or temporary bans
Nslchaosfast u want battle ok go to dark cong
Sigh, next year then.....congrats to the winners....
Closed subject, edition on January 01st
now just change da number....gee
Tnx i will go to danger zone
That player, who was on turn when the game was time-out cannot play any match for 1 hour. A think, that is is fair. If you lost connection, you cannot play, if you time-out, because you was losing, you got penalty.
That will solve problems with time-outs in AELO mode and ind Daily Tournaments of course too.
I want tounnament
I have got kinjo, ratana, yookie, alexie,e ryton, carlos, striker and lewis in my deck. You should probalby buy new blood.
Can we be friend
I created a topic about this, please vote there
Count me in2 go english
Guild war sounds cool though
I sorry but I didn't quite get the point, could you clear it?
I think that Kmathie has a point... Some player may have payed for Pussycats their hard earned clintz, and now when they finally have them, they will be banned and their price will go down. But I also agree that something must be done, cos Pussycats are over-powered in ELO... what about banning just one them? Or maybe making the strong couple (chosen from poll) collector ( Cr ) and made new Pussycat, not so powerful... I think that can be also an option... Maybe the the best will be to ban one of them, and make the other collectors, so one of them will go down with price, while the other one will go up...
I was just looking through the daily tournaments history and what caught my attention was that in the last tourney I had the same number of points as the guys on places 24 and 25, but ended up 26. So my question is - wouldn't it be more fair that players with the same number of battle points are put on one place ex aequo? I feel a bit cheated.